Roma-Fiorentina is destined to cause debate for a long time between doubts and blasphemies. Iachini protested focusing his attention on another aspect: "The action of Roma's second penalty was spoiled by a touch from the referee."
You pass the first penalty (in fact, Lirola's foul on Peres is quite clear …) but not the second … at the Viola home they don't want to make a point of the penalty that gave Roma the victory.
Fiorentina's anger had already been perceived on the pitch given the numerous blasphemies at the time of assigning the second penalty of the day to the Giallorossi.
Iachini provides further food for thought by arguing about a touch of the referee that would have spoiled the action in the bud. Here are his statements to Sky Sport.
“I don't want to talk about the contact that led to Roma's second penalty, I mean that the action was spoiled in the bud by a touch of the referee.
In these cases, regardless of how the action develops, the regulation is clear. The action must be stopped immediately and the ball must be bowl.
I have exaggerated with the protests, and in this I am wrong. But I simply asked the referee to go and review the action at the var. In this way he would have noticed his touch and would not have assigned the penalty to Roma ”.
Source: Blitz Quotidiano