Inter, Dzeko on pole. Zapata the alternative. Pros and cons of both

Inter, Dzeko in pole. Zapata l'alternativa. Pro e contro di entrambi

Inter, Dzeko on pole. Zapata the alternative. Pros and cons of both. Photo ANSA / ANGELO CARCONI

MILAN – Despite the rapprochement of recent days, the roads of Mauro Icardi and Inter will almost certainly separate at the end of the season. This attempt at peace is appropriate for both. Icardi has to return to the field to earn the call for the America's Cup next summer, Inter is paying him and for this reason he wants to use it until the end to achieve the seasonal goal which is the qualification for the next Champions League. At the end of the season, the Nerazzurri should sell it to the highest bidder (at the moment Juventus is on pole with Napoli).

Inter, Dzeko on pole for the post-Icardi. Zapata first alternative

Inter is already projected after Icardi. Lautaro Martinez, who is shining with both the Nerazzurri and the Argentine national team, is promoted with full marks but naturally not enough in a squad that must be competitive on three fronts (league, Europe and Italian Cup). For this reason the Nerazzurri have decided to buy another great striker. On pole there would be Edin Dzeko . The Bosnian broke with Rome, the bad moods in the field are proof of this.

Dzeko wants to stay in Italy and Inter would be a great place for him. The pros are in the cost of its tag, which is not high, and in its reliability at high levels. The most negative thing is his engagement, which is very high. The first alternative to Dzeko is Duvan Zapata. The Colombian knows our league, he earns much less than Dzeko but his card costs a lot. Atalanta will redeem it at 26 million and wants to sell it for at least 45 million euros. A figure considered too high by the Nerazzurri.

The Inter article , Dzeko on pole. Zapata the alternative. Pros and cons of both seem to be the first on daily Blitz .

Source: Blitz Quotidiano

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: